Select Page

Good Thursday 18 October, 2012.  Thanks for listening to, participating in, and ENGAGING w/ IDECLAIR MEDIA, THE IDECLAIR SHOW…

Today, have you been ‘encouraged’ to vote a certain way from your employer?  

In a June 6th 2012 conference call, Mitt Romney encourages employers to encourage employees to vote “in the best interest of your enterprise, and therefore their job.”  Do you have a problem with this?  

Thank you Labor Reporter, Mike Elk of

WEDNESDAY OCT 17, 2012 4:54 PM

“In Conference Call, Romney Urged Businesses To Tell Their Employees How to Vote”


Mitt Romney:

“I hope you make it very clear to your employees what you believe is in the best interest of your enterprise and therefore their job and their future in the upcoming elections. And whether you agree with me or you agree with President Obama, or whatever your political view, I hope, I hope you pass those along to your employees.”


Read about the pro Romney mail out to 45k employees.

OCTOBER 14, 2012

“Koch Sends Pro-Romney Mailing to 45,000 Employees While Stifling Workplace Political Speech (Update)”

“The billionaire Koch brothers have found a new way to influence the 2012 election: preaching to employees.”



Yesterday, U.S. Senator John Kerry (D-MA), President Obama’s debate preparation partner, sat w/ Joe Scarborough, & the Morning Joe team.  Sen. John Kerry eloquently goes ‘REAL RAW RIGHT NOW…’ on the “FRAUD” candidacy of Mitt Romney!

The people of Massachusetts know Romney.  The must watch interview is serious, candid, powerful, & politely ‘REAL RAW RIGHT NOW… ‘

Take a look.

“John Kerry: Romney was ‘petulant,’ and ‘expediently misleading’ in debate”


Sen. John Kerry:  “It’s time to get really serious about what’s on the table here in this choice.  I’m perplexed.  Mitt Romney last night was petulant, in my judgment.  He was characteristically, expediently misleading.  Mitt Romney is perpetrating a fraud on the American people.  His centerpiece plan…is a one point plan: a tax cut.” 
With Presidential election 2012 just days away, Americans are hearing a lot about the deficit, and the serious issue the deficit has become.  This is true.  However the allocation of responsibility for the deficit has been blurred, and flat out misdirected by many on the right.  
Get the facts.  Thank you Center On Budget & Policy Priorities. 

“Downturn and Legacy of Bush Policies Drive Large Current Deficits
Economic Recovery Measures, Financial Rescues Have Only Temporary Impact”

An excerpt:

“Some lawmakers, pundits, and others continue to say that President George W. Bush’s policies did not drive the projected federal deficits of the coming decade — that, instead, it was the policies of President Obama and Congress in 2009 and 2010.  But, the fact remains:  the economic downturn, President Bush’s tax cuts and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq explain most of the deficit over the next ten years — according to this update of our analysis, which is based on the Congressional Budget Office’s most recent ten-year budget projections (from August) and congressional action since we released the previous version of this analysis in May 2011.

The deficit for fiscal year 2009 — which began more than three months before President Obama’s inauguration — was $1.4 trillion and, at 10 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the largest deficit relative to the economy since the end of World War II.  At $1.3 trillion and nearly 9 percent of GDP, the deficits in 2010 and 2011 were only slightly lower.  If current policies remain in place, deficits will likely exceed $1 trillion in 2012 and 2013 before subsiding slightly, and never fall below $700 billion for the remainder of this decade.

The events and policies that pushed deficits to these high levels in the near term were, for the most part, not of President Obama’s making.  If not for the Bush tax cuts, the deficit-financed wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the effects of the worst recession since the Great Depression (including the cost of policymakers’ actions to combat it), we would not be facing these huge deficits in the near term.  By themselves, in fact, the Bush tax cuts and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will account for almost half of the $18 trillion in debt that, under current policies, the nation will owe by 2019.[1]   The stimulus measures and financial rescues will account for less than 10 percent of the debt at that time.

President Obama, however, still has a responsibility to propose, and put the weight of his office behind, policies that will address our key long-term fiscal challenge — preventing the significant rise in debt as a percentage of GDP that will occur under current policies.  Allowing the flagship Bush tax cuts — which initially were slated to end after 2010 and were extended for two years — to expire on schedule at the end of 2012 would halt the rise in the debt-to-GDP ratio.  In fact, that step — or an equivalent, substitute package of deficit reductions — would reduce the debt-to-GDP ratio and stabilize it at about 70 percent in the second half of the decade.  Of course, with the economy still fragile, it is prudent to continue the middle-class portion of the tax cuts for a while longer.  But there is no justification for extending the entire set of expiring tax cuts indefinitely.  To keep the debt stable over the longer run, when the fiscal impacts of an aging population and rising health care costs will continue to mount, policymakers will need to take large additional steps on both the expenditure and revenue sides of the budget.”


All this, more, and your REAL RAW RIGHT NOW… 



Invent Something.  Create Something.  OWN YOUR Something.  




M-F 11AM ET live 

No Matter What… Know YOUR Value!  No Matter What… Know YOU Matter! 


No Matter What… VOTE!